Participation in rural areas: trends and challenges
Authors: Spyros Papadatos, SALTO Participation & Information
Year of production: 2026
Image by: rdne stock project
Every year technology and digitalisation offer more and more opportunities, and every generation appears to be more connected with the various possibilities than the previous ones. At the same time the so-called urban-rural gap seems to be widening more and more as time passes. In Europe and beyond, rural and remote areas can struggle to keep up when compared with the rapid developments of urban and suburban areas and ultimately are quite often being left behind. Participation in rural areas faces unique challenges that need to be addressed in order to ensure that all voices, especially those of rural communities, are equally heard and valued.
Barriers to participation in rural areas
Facilitating participation in rural areas requires overcoming barriers such as geographical limitations, isolation, lack of infrastructure, and limited access to opportunities. The physical distances between rural areas and the capitals, where decision-makers are usually based and where the majority of decisions are being taken, is a reality that enhances the feeling of isolation for many rural citizens. Moreover, policies are being shaped away from rural areas and lack the inputs of members of those communities, even when such policies will have an impact on them. The wider accessibility to opportunities is hindered by the lack of physical and digital infrastructure. This fuels the so-called “rural exodus” that is taking place as people look to find better opportunities outside of the rural areas. This is creating a demographic decline of rural areas and a lack of generational renewal. All these factors further feed into the wider feeling in rural communities of “being left behind”. There is also a feeling of being perceived as a lower priority for decision-makers due to the distances from big urban centres and because they are lower density populations.
Community strength and engagement opportunities
Despite these challenges, rural areas still offer unique opportunities for participation due to the close bonds that can be found in them. Rural communities can foster a strong feeling of cohesion and thus more easily mobilise individuals around common goals. Rural organisations, movements and networks can work as platforms for collective action, community engagement and decision-making. Access to physical spaces is potentially less competitive due to the lower population density and the availability of spaces, as opposed to urban centres where physical space is limited and often quite competitive to acquire. The local initiatives that already exist in rural communities, such as festivals, markets, and cultural or religious gatherings, are opportunities for engaging the members of the communities in discussions about local issues. Additionally, the citizens and the local decision-makers have a direct space for interaction and communication.
The need for policy adaptation
It is also essential, at the policy level, to recognise the challenges faced by rural communities in accessing democratic participation or in general, the opportunities that non-rural citizens have in more urban settings. In rural areas, there are more limited resources and options (both financial and human resources) in organisations that can foster participation, there is limited access to citizens’ organisations per se, and there is a general lack of infrastructure. As a result, it can be more challenging for citizens to engage in civic activities, to meaningfully participate in developing policies, and to make their voices heard. To address this, it is essential for governments and for institutions to rural proof their policies while they are still under development and before their adoption and implementation. It is essential that they look through and examine them using a “rural lens” in order to make these policies fit for purpose for those who live and work in rural areas.
Article produced in the framework of the project “Understanding democratic participation across sectors”
Expert group: Anni Karttunen, Charlie Moreno-Romero, Per-Åke Rosvall, Spyros Papadatos, Tomaž Deželan
Coordination: Joana Freitas (SALTO Participation & Information)
Copyedit: Nik Paddington
Project dates: February 2024 to May 2025
Further exploration: Books and publications
European Commission. (2021). Long-term Vision for Rural Areas: Towards stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas by 2040. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=comnat:COM_2024_0450_FIN
Farrugia, D. (2014). Towards a spatialised youth sociology: the rural and the urban in times of change. Journal of Youth Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.830700
Rosvall, P.-Å., Rönnlund, M., & Johansson, M. (2018). Young people’s career choices in Swedish rural contexts: Schools’ social codes, migration and resources. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.02.007
Shucksmith, M. (2012). Class, Power and Inequality in Rural Areas: Beyond Social Exclusion? Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00570.x
Shucksmith, M., Cameron, S., Merridew, T., & Pichler, F. (2009). Urban–Rural Differences in Quality of Life across the European Union. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802378750

