Exploring forms of democratic participation
Authors: Spyros Papadatos, SALTO Participation & Information
Year of production: 2025
lara-jameson
Democratic participation is the backbone of democracy. Participation in today’s society can take many different forms, each one reflecting the diversity of those different societies. These different forms of democratic participation contribute to a dynamic political environment. In these environments citizens can engage at local, regional, national, and international levels to influence or shape decisions that affect their lives.
When exploring various forms of democratic participation there can be several ways to cluster them into different groups and categories. Some distinct ways to categorise the forms of participation are as follows:
Face-to-face/offline vs. online forms of participation
Face-to-face or offline forms of participation refer to traditional or physical engagement where citizens participate in person. Online forms of participation on the other hand, refer to digital and virtual forms of participation that allow citizens to engage through the internet.
Examples:
- Face-to-face/offline: Elections and voting, meeting decision-makers, public demonstrations, and citizens assemblies.
- Online: E-democracy platforms, consultations, petitions, social media advocacy, online fora and movements, and social media campaigns.
Traditional vs. alternative forms of participation
Traditional forms of participation refer to established, institutionalised methods of engaging with the democratic process. These are often embedded within legal frameworks. Alternative forms of participation are newer, more informal, and may operate outside of conventional political structures.
Examples:
- Traditional: Elections and voting, petitions, referendums, and membership in political parties.
- Alternative: Protests, demonstrations, digital activism, petitions, and citizen assemblies.
Institutionalised vs. non-institutionalised forms of participation:
Institutionalised forms of participation refer to forms of engagement that are officially recognised and embedded within legal or governmental frameworks. Non-institutionalised forms of participation refer to informal or grassroots activities that are not embedded within formal political structures.
Examples:
- Institutionalised: Elections and voting, petitions, referendums, European Citizens Initiative, EU Youth Dialogue, and public consultations of legal frameworks.
- Non-institutionalised: Protests, demonstrations, social media activism, grassroots campaigns, and participation in Civil Society Organisations (CSO).
Direct vs. indirect forms of participation:
Direct forms of participation refer to engagement where citizens are directly involved in decision-making processes. This does not generally include representatives or intermediaries. Indirect forms of participation refer to engagement where citizens influence decisions through representatives or intermediaries, such as CSOs or elected officials.
Examples:
- Direct: Elections and voting, referendums, participatory budgeting, and European Citizens Initiative.
- Indirect: Membership in CSOs, consultations, and membership in political parties.
Top-down vs. bottom-up forms of participation
Top-down forms of participation refer to engagements initiated and led by institutions or governments. These are often with structured frameworks for citizens to provide inputs. Bottom-up forms of participation refer to engagements initiated by citizens or CSOs which are often outside of formal channels.
Examples:
- Top-down: Government-led consultations, citizen advisory boards, and public hearings.
- Bottom-up: Grassroots campaigns, protests, community-led initiatives, and social movements.
None of these examples of forms of participation, nor the presented ways of classification, are exhaustive. They are listed because they are some of the more prominent ways of clustering and they are some of the most prominent examples of participation. Participation in democratic life consists of many diverse ways in which people individually and/or in groups can express and act on their needs and opinions. It is also about how citizens can impact policies, decisions, and any other developments that influence social change.
Article produced in the framework of the project “Understanding democratic participation across sectors”
Expert group: Anni Karttunen, Charlie Moreno-Romero, Per-Åke Rosvall, Spyros Papadatos, Tomaž Deželan
Coordination: Joana Freitas (SALTO Participation & Information)
Copyedit: Nik Paddington
Project dates: February 2024 to May 2025
Further exploration: Books and publications
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Council of Europe. (2003). Revised European charter on the participation of young people in local and regional life. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe. Council of Europe.
Crowley, A., & Moxon, D. (2017). New and innovative forms of youth participation in decision-making processes. Council of Europe.
Ekman, Joakim, & Amnå, Erik. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Örebro universitet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hart, R. A. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. UNICEF International Child Development Centre.
Hoskins, B. L., & Mascherini, M. (2008). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9271-2
Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2017). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policymaking and democracy revisited. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1365712
Pateman, C. (1975). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.

